Factsheet: Managing Disputes About Medical Treatment Decision-Making
End of life decision-making can be challenging for everyone involved in a person’s care, and sometimes disagreements can arise. This factsheet explores what legal and other avenues are available to manage conflict that arises in aged care about medical treatment decision-making. It focuses on managing disputes between health professionals (or aged care workers) and a person (or their families).
Clarifying the law
This factsheet explains:
- How disputes can be resolved within aged care
- If a dispute cannot be resolved, what legal avenues are available
- The role of Public Advocates and Public Guardians, tribunals and courts in medical treatment disputes
Medical treatment disputes in aged care
As a person nears the end of their life, disagreements sometimes occur about their medical treatment. In aged care, these disputes generally arise when there is disagreement between an aged care worker (or health professional) and a person (or, if the person lacks capacity, their family or substitute decision-maker) about a medical treatment decision.
- An aged care worker believes a resident’s family or substitute decision-maker is making treatment decisions contrary to the resident’s preferences or best interests.
- Conflict with residents or families about types and doses of medication.
- Disputes about hospital transfers, or when medical treatment should be provided.
- Disputes about provision of pain and symptom relief.
- Requests from families for treatment to be provided, even if it would be futile or non-beneficial for the person.
- Disputes between family members about who is the person’s substitute decision-maker.
Managing disputes in aged care
Communication about treatment
Communication with the person and their family about future treatment and care, including the person’s values and preferences, is essential. Early, proactive communication can avoid future conflict, and ensure the person’s preferences and needs are met.
This can occur by residents, families, aged care workers and health professionals meeting early, preferably when the person enters aged care, to discuss advance care planning. The person can also choose to record their treatment decisions and preferences in an Advance Care Directive.
It is important for aged care workers and health professionals to involve the person, and their family (provided the person consents) or, if the person lacks capacity, their family or substitute decision-maker in all discussions about the person’s care and treatment. This is particularly important for conversations about withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment or futile or non-beneficial treatment. This can help to achieve consensus about treatment, and allows any problems to be addressed as early as possible.
Disputes can also be avoided by aged care organisations and workers:
- Providing information to residents and their families about palliative care and end of life decision-making, and the role and obligations of substitute decision-makers.
- Providing education for staff on recognising a person’s deterioration so appropriate and timely palliative and end of life care can be provided, and families or substitute decision-makers advised.
- Obtaining the person’s medication orders, prescriptions and instructions from the person’s GP early to enable timely access to and provision of end of life care and treatment.
- Respecting the person’s treatment decision. Remember that it is lawful for a person with capacity to refuse to go to hospital or to receive life-sustaining treatment even if it will result in death.
- Knowing what the law says about providing treatment by reading the following End of Life Law Toolkit factsheets:
- Capacity and Consent to Medical Treatment
- Advance Care Directives
- Substitute Decision-Making
- Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment
- Legal Protection for Administering Pain and Symptom Relief
- Futile or Non-Beneficial Treatment
- Emergency Medical Treatment.
What to do if a dispute arises
When a dispute arises, early resolution can prevent it from escalating. In most situations it is rare for the legal system to become involved. Most conflict can be managed within the aged care setting by applying your aged care organisation’s complaints or disputes management policies and procedures.
It is important to know what those policies or procedures say so that you can take appropriate action if a dispute arises. This includes knowing who is responsible at each point of the process, relevant timeframes for reporting and addressing complaints, and what documentation must be completed.
Most organisations will require an aged care worker to advise their manager as soon as possible about the dispute. In most cases a manager will determine the appropriate course of action, based on the nature of the dispute. This action may include:
- Meeting with the aged care worker to obtain information about the dispute;
- Asking an aged care worker to complete a complaint, incident or feedback form outlining the issues; and/or
- Arranging an informal meeting or case conference with the resident or their family to discuss the issues. A formal conference may be arranged for more serious disputes.
Every situation is different, so the action taken will depend on the circumstances, the severity of the issue, and the nature of the medical treatment or care.
When a dispute cannot be resolved, a manager may advise their senior manager or CEO, or seek advice from a lawyer or their State or Territory’s Public Advocate or Public Guardian.
If you are a GP involved in a dispute, you can also seek advice from your medical insurer or medical defence organisation.
Aged Care Quality and Safety Commissioner
In some cases where there is a dispute, a complaint may be made to the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission. (https://www. agedcarequality.gov.au/making-complaint/ complaints-process). The Commission is responsible for dealing with complaints about Australian Government-funded aged care services. It provides a free service for anyone to raise concerns about the quality of care or services delivered. All complaints are taken seriously and they can be made openly, confidentially or anonymously.
Disputes and the legal system
If a dispute cannot be resolved within the aged care system, the guardianship or legal system may become involved. The Public Advocate or Public Guardian are independent statutory bodies in each State and Territory. They have powers relating to guardianship and end of life decision-making for people who lack capacity. Aged care services and workers, or health professionals may contact these bodies when:
What is the role of guardianship bodies?
The Public Advocate or Public Guardian are independent statutory bodies in each State and Territory. They have powers relating to guardianship and end of life decision-making for people who lack capacity. Aged care services and workers, or health professionals may contact these bodies when:
- a dispute about treatment for a person who lacks capacity cannot be resolved internally;
- they disagree with a decision of a substitute decision-maker;
- there is no substitute decision-maker appointed or available; or
- there is a disagreement about who is the appropriate substitute decision-maker, or a conflict between joint substitute decision-makers.
The powers of the Public Advocates and Public Guardians vary by State and Territory, but they may be able to provide advice about dispute resolution options; mediate disputes; apply to a court or tribunal to be appointed as a substitute decision-maker (if no one else is available or appropriate); or make a treatment decision (in limited circumstances only).
What can be done if a dispute remains unresolved?
If a treatment dispute remains unresolved, a health professional, aged care worker or service, the person, their family or substitute decision-maker may apply to a State or Territory tribunal or the Supreme Court for an order.
There is no legal requirement to refer an unresolved dispute to a tribunal or court. However, it is good practice to seek legal advice about this when appropriate (e.g. from an aged care facility’s lawyer), and also to tell the person’s family or substitute decision-maker about this option.
How do tribunals and courts address medical treatment disputes?
State and Territory tribunals
Tribunals in each State and Territory have powers to decide medical treatment disputes involving adults who lack capacity. These tribunals are like courts but are designed to be quicker, cheaper and easier to use.
The types of matters tribunals may decide and the orders they may make differ depending on State and Territory laws. These might include deciding whether or not a person has decision-making capacity; or appointing or revoking the appointment of a substitute decision-maker e.g. a guardian. Depending on the State or Territory, tribunals may also have power to decide whether to consent or refuse consent to medical treatment, or whether life-sustaining treatment should be withheld or withdrawn.
In making decisions, tribunals must consider a range of factors outlined in State or Territory guardianship and medical treatment legislation. This generally includes the person’s best interests, and what the person would have wanted for themselves.
The Supreme Court
The Supreme Court in each State and Territory has broad powers to resolve disputes about medical treatment, and to confirm whether or not providing, withholding or withdrawing treatment would be lawful.
Generally cases are bought before courts and tribunals by aged care services rather than individual health professionals or aged care workers. Before instigating court proceedings, legal advice should be sought.
When making a decision a Supreme Court must consider the person’s best interests. There are no established criteria for determining this, but the courts will consider factors including:
- medical evidence regarding the person’s diagnosis, prognosis and treatment options;
- whether the requested treatment is overly burdensome (so that the burdens of treatment outweigh any possible benefits);
- views and wishes of the person about treatment (and, to a lesser extent, views of the person’s family); and
- quality of life of the person if they receive treatment (which the courts have considered particularly when the person has significant cognitive impairment).
In most cases, the courts have agreed with medical opinion about whether or not providing life-sustaining treatment was in the person’s best interests. However, this is not always the case.
- Most disagreements about medical treatment can be resolved through good communication and timely dispute resolution processes within aged care settings.
- When a dispute cannot be resolved within aged care, advice or assistance may be sought from the Public Advocate or Public Guardian.
- State and Territory tribunals are able to hear disputes about end of life medical treatment. Their powers, the orders they may make, and how they make decisions vary depending on the guardianship and medical treatment legislation of the State or Territory.
- The State and Territory Supreme Courts also have powers to resolve disputes about medical treatment at the end of life. When making a decision for adults who lack capacity, the Courts’ paramount consideration is the person’s best interests.